NX I (AZ10) vs XC90 II: which is better?
Lexus NX I (AZ10) (2014–2021) vs Volvo XC90 II (2014–present): specs, fuel economy, tax and common problems.
Lexus NX I (AZ10)
Volvo XC90 IISpecifications
| Lexus NX I (AZ10) | Volvo XC90 II | |
|---|---|---|
| Production years | 2014–2021 | 2014–present |
| Body | crossover SUV | crossover SUV |
| Fuel | petrol | petrol |
| Engines | 2.0 Turbo (NX200t) | 2.0 Turbo (T5 / T6) |
| Power, up to | 238 hp | 249 hp |
| Torque, up to | 350 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Gearbox | automatic | automatic |
| Drive | all-wheel drive | all-wheel drive |
| Length | 4 630 mm | 4 950 mm |
| Width | 1 845 mm | 1 923 mm |
| Height | 1 645 mm | 1 776 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2 660 mm | 2 984 mm |
| Fuel tank | 60 L | 71 L |
| KZ tax 2026 (car under 10 years) | ≈ 16 475 ₸ | ≈ 16 475 ₸ |
The better value is highlighted in green.
Pros, cons and common problems
Lexus NX I (AZ10)
Pros
- Gearbox Aisin automatic: generally reliable
- All-wheel-drive versions available
- Sold in all major markets of the region — parts and mechanics available
Cons
- Gearbox Aisin automatic: valve body wear at high mileage
Gearbox (Aisin automatic): generally reliable; at high mileage — valve body wear.
Volvo XC90 II
Pros
- Gearbox Aisin automatic: generally reliable
- Powerful versions: up to 249 hp
- All-wheel-drive versions available
- Large tank: 71 L
Cons
- Gearbox Aisin automatic: valve body wear at high mileage
Gearbox (Aisin automatic): generally reliable; at high mileage — valve body wear.
Which one to choose
- XC90 II — if you care more about: power, wheelbase, fuel tank.
The condition of a specific car matters more than the model: check the service history and get the engine and gearbox inspected before buying.
FAQ
Which is more powerful: NX I (AZ10) or XC90 II?
NX I (AZ10): up to 238 hp, XC90 II: up to 249 hp.
What is the vehicle tax in Kazakhstan?
For 2026, for a car under 10 years old: NX I (AZ10) — about 16 475 ₸, XC90 II — about 16 475 ₸ (base engine). A 0.7 factor applies to cars aged 10–20 years and 0.5 to cars over 20.