Русский · Қазақша

3 Series E30 vs 626 II (GC): which is better?

BMW 3 Series E30 (1982–1994) vs Mazda 626 II (GC) (1982–1987): specs, fuel economy, tax and common problems.

BMW 3 Series E30BMW 3 Series E30Mazda 626 II (GC)Mazda 626 II (GC)

Specifications

BMW 3 Series E30Mazda 626 II (GC)
Production years1982–19941982–1987
Bodysedansedan
Fuelpetrolpetrol
Engines1.8 (318i)2.0
Power, up to113 hp101 hp
Torque, up to162 Nm—
Gearboxmanualmanual
Driverear-wheel drivefront-wheel drive
Length4 325 mm—
Width1 645 mm—
Height1 380 mm—
Wheelbase2 570 mm—
Fuel tank55 L—
KZ tax 2026 (car under 10 years)≈ 15 075 ₸≈ 16 475 ₸

The better value is highlighted in green.

Pros, cons and common problems

BMW 3 Series E30

Pros

  • Sold in all major markets of the region — parts and mechanics available

Cons

  • Age: the last cars were built in 1994, condition is everything

Mazda 626 II (GC)

Pros

  • Sold in all major markets of the region — parts and mechanics available

Cons

  • Age: the last cars were built in 1987, condition is everything

Which one to choose

The condition of a specific car matters more than the model: check the service history and get the engine and gearbox inspected before buying.

FAQ

Which is more powerful: 3 Series E30 or 626 II (GC)?

3 Series E30: up to 113 hp, 626 II (GC): up to 101 hp.

What is the vehicle tax in Kazakhstan?

For 2026, for a car under 10 years old: 3 Series E30 — about 15 075 ₸, 626 II (GC) — about 16 475 ₸ (base engine). A 0.7 factor applies to cars aged 10–20 years and 0.5 to cars over 20.

Other comparisons