Русский · Қазақша

5 Series E28 vs 626 II (GC): which is better?

BMW 5 Series E28 (1981–1988) vs Mazda 626 II (GC) (1982–1987): specs, fuel economy, tax and common problems.

BMW 5 Series E28BMW 5 Series E28Mazda 626 II (GC)Mazda 626 II (GC)

Specifications

BMW 5 Series E28Mazda 626 II (GC)
Production years1981–19881982–1987
Bodysedansedan
Fuelpetrolpetrol
Engines2.0 (520i)2.0
Power, up to125 hp101 hp
Torque, up to165 Nm—
Gearboxmanualmanual
Driverear-wheel drivefront-wheel drive
Length4 620 mm—
Width1 700 mm—
Height1 415 mm—
Wheelbase2 625 mm—
Fuel tank70 L—
KZ tax 2026 (car under 10 years)≈ 16 475 ₸≈ 16 475 ₸

The better value is highlighted in green.

Pros, cons and common problems

BMW 5 Series E28

Pros

  • Large tank: 70 L
  • Sold in all major markets of the region — parts and mechanics available

Cons

  • Age: the last cars were built in 1988, condition is everything

Mazda 626 II (GC)

Pros

  • Sold in all major markets of the region — parts and mechanics available

Cons

  • Age: the last cars were built in 1987, condition is everything

Which one to choose

The condition of a specific car matters more than the model: check the service history and get the engine and gearbox inspected before buying.

FAQ

Which is more powerful: 5 Series E28 or 626 II (GC)?

5 Series E28: up to 125 hp, 626 II (GC): up to 101 hp.

What is the vehicle tax in Kazakhstan?

For 2026, for a car under 10 years old: 5 Series E28 — about 16 475 ₸, 626 II (GC) — about 16 475 ₸ (base engine). A 0.7 factor applies to cars aged 10–20 years and 0.5 to cars over 20.

Other comparisons

5 Series vs E-ClassBMW 5 Series E28 / Mercedes-Benz E-Class W1245 Series vs 190BMW 5 Series E28 / Mercedes-Benz 190 W2015 Series vs 3 SeriesBMW 5 Series E28 / BMW 3 Series E30626 vs 190Mazda 626 II (GC) / Mercedes-Benz 190 W201626 vs 100Mazda 626 II (GC) / Audi 100 C3626 vs 3 SeriesMazda 626 II (GC) / BMW 3 Series E30626 vs 2107Mazda 626 II (GC) / Lada 2107