CR-V II vs RAV4 XA20: which is better?
Honda CR-V II (2001–2006) vs Toyota RAV4 XA20 (2000–2005): specs, fuel economy, tax and common problems.
Honda CR-V II
Toyota RAV4 XA20Specifications
| Honda CR-V II | Toyota RAV4 XA20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Production years | 2001–2006 | 2000–2005 |
| Body | crossover SUV | crossover SUV |
| Fuel | petrol | petrol |
| Engines | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Power, up to | 150 hp | 150 hp |
| Torque, up to | 192 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Gearbox | automatic | automatic |
| Drive | all-wheel drive | all-wheel drive |
| Length | 4 575 mm | 4 245 mm |
| Width | 1 780 mm | 1 735 mm |
| Height | 1 710 mm | 1 695 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2 620 mm | 2 490 mm |
| Ground clearance | — | 190 mm |
| Fuel tank | 58 L | 57 L |
| KZ tax 2026 (car under 10 years) | ≈ 16 475 ₸ | ≈ 16 475 ₸ |
The better value is highlighted in green.
Pros, cons and common problems
Honda CR-V II
Pros
- All-wheel-drive versions available
- Conventional automatic, no robotized gearbox or CVT
- Sold in all major markets of the region — parts and mechanics available
Cons
- Honda K20/K24 engine: VTC actuator rattle on cold start
Engine (Honda K20/K24): VTC actuator rattle on cold start; oil consumption on the K24Z (2008–2012); crankshaft seal leak.
Toyota RAV4 XA20
Pros
- All-wheel-drive versions available
- Conventional automatic, no robotized gearbox or CVT
- Sold in all major markets of the region — parts and mechanics available
Cons
- Age: the last cars were built in 2005, condition is everything
Which one to choose
- CR-V II — if you care more about: wheelbase, fuel tank.
The condition of a specific car matters more than the model: check the service history and get the engine and gearbox inspected before buying.
FAQ
Which is more powerful: CR-V II or RAV4 XA20?
CR-V II: up to 150 hp, RAV4 XA20: up to 150 hp.
What is the vehicle tax in Kazakhstan?
For 2026, for a car under 10 years old: CR-V II — about 16 475 ₸, RAV4 XA20 — about 16 475 ₸ (base engine). A 0.7 factor applies to cars aged 10–20 years and 0.5 to cars over 20.